Conventional Wisdom?
I watched a little more than 2 hours of coverage tonight. Not because I wanted to, but because I felt I needed to. I wanted to understand the Republican platform and see just where our differences lied. I consider myself a very moderate democrate, conservative fiscally, but socially liberal. That said, I wanted to see what this platform was about.
What I saw made me sick as well. Here's why.
If you removed a few key figures, you could have been at the Green Party's Convention. Where the hell did I learn anything about the Republicans last night? The entire night was a prostitution of the tragedy that was 9/11, followed by speeches by the two most LIBERAL Republicans in the party.
Let's start with the 9/11 Memorial segment, which may have shown me the most about the republican platform, which is that they are not above unabashedly milking pain and anguish for political gain. It was notable to me as well that they only brought out the women that were left behind. Because we all no that no men were widowed that day. Or is it simply that we are supposed to feel more simpathy for women? It occurred to me that in the Republican ideology, perhaps we are supposed to view these women as pathetic creatures too ill prepared to take care of themselves now that their men have been taken from them. And that pisses me off.
It pisses me off as well that they can raise the flag, sing the anthems, and say nothing. And yet Kerry gets attacked for not having a platform?! I've yet to hear what Bush has in store for a second term, aside from a constitutional amendment against gay marriage, a possible war in Iran, and oh yeah, another 30 day vacation in Texas each year.
The idea that Kerry flip flops is not an unfounded one. You have to call a spade a spade. But flip flopping is a manner of political manuevering and positioning and what the Republicans did next is no different.
First there was McCain, then Guiliani. The two most liberal republicans in the party. THEY ARE NOT EVEN REPUBLICANS! Talk about wanting it both ways, these guys only agree with Bush on one thing...Iraq. Neither agree with the religious right, both are more socially and environmentally conscious, and the list goes on and on. But here they were, front and center on opening night, as if they were the model for this party.
I learned from McCain that his friends in the democratic party think one way and his friends in the republican party think another. Think this guy doesn't want it both ways? At least he had the decency not to bash his 'friend' John Kerry as much as he and the Republican party bashed Michael Moore.
Then came Guiliani, whose speech was equal parts lie and exageration. As he spoke I couldn't help, but think he was having difficulty with his own words, as if he could barely believe he was saying them. Perhaps it was because I doubt he believed much of what he said, he was only smart enough to realize that if he wanted a prayer at the White House in 2008 he better make friends now. So he continued on, comparing Bush to every great leader with the exception of Ghandi. Yeah, he's Winston Churchill and Ronald Reagan all rolled up into one. The greatness of Churchill and the fact that he is a Republican like Reagan.
I love how the Republican party throws out Abraham Lincoln as a great Republican president. Little history for your folks, he was a democrat with democratic values whose party happened to once upon a time, call itself Republican. As in forming a more perfect republic.
Both speakers spoke of FDR, who yes, was a Democrat. In fact, while I take an aside, when was the last successful war run by a Republican? Was it Woodrow Wilson in WWI? Nope, he was liberal. FDR in WWII? Nope, another democrat. How about Truman? Nope. Was it a republican that helped avoid war during the Cuban missle crisis? No, that was Kennedy. It was a Republican that got us mired in Vietnam though (Nixon). So let me ask you, where was the proof again that the Democratics couldn't handle war?
There was a shot of a black man standing in the crowd during Guiliani's speech. My first thought was that he was lost. My second was that he was security. My third was that they were holding that short way too long, as if he was the ONE black man in the crowd. He certainly wasn't the only one over 60 though. Man, if we postpone the election for a few months 1/2 of the Republican delegates might keel over.
So I watched as Guiliani's speech went long, not surprised as I know how much he likes to hear himself lisp, I mean talk. And in the end, I still know nothing more about the party. I know that it still refuses to define its platform, but likes to attack Kerry on the issues it refuses to stand on. I know that we are fighting against Kerry on Vietnam, Iraq because of terrorism that doesn't exist, and a war on terror that isn't a war because we can't win it. No we can win it. No we can't win it.
I'd say fool me once, shame on me, except I was never fooled and Bush says that saying much better than me anyone. I will say that that it has become apparent to me that this election will not be won with the truth. It will not be fought on the issues. It will not be respectable, nor honorable. The liberal media bias will mean that CBS is the only network that will air parts of the Republican convention and that Fox will be fair and balanced by devoting 90 minutes to the Republican's opening night after giving 20 minutes to the Democrats opening night. I know that either 100,000 or 500,000 people protested against Bush on Sunday depending upon which party you ask. I know our poverty rate is up and our economy is down. I know that it is our enemies and not our allies that are growing and that our armed forces are stretched far and wide to fight a 'war' that our own president said we cannot win.
And I know that I will be voting for Kerry.


